<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome Operating System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/</link>
	<description>Eat. Drink. Design.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:20:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dustin</title>
		<link>http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-52592</link>
		<dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kitsunenoir.com/blog/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/#comment-52592</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I like the web browser Chrome well enough. Hopefully this will live up to it&#039;s amazing simplicity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I like the web browser Chrome well enough. Hopefully this will live up to it&#8217;s amazing simplicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suneemil</title>
		<link>http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-52563</link>
		<dc:creator>Suneemil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kitsunenoir.com/blog/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/#comment-52563</guid>
		<description>@Rob McDougall

I think it&#039;s only a matter of time. As with the idea behind this OS everything can be moved on the web which would make it smarter for the user since they then can have access to their stuff no matter where they are. At some point I&#039;m sure Photoshop, After Effects, Final Cut etc. will be moved onto servers where your then pay for having access an amount of time. When you&#039;ve payed you get directed to some sort of online remote desktop from where you can use the application online. When you&#039;re done with your job you can send you files to your online storage device. It&#039;s all be flowing and you won&#039;t have the need to buy a new superduper computer with the latest graphics and processor power every third year since the company will be doing that making sure their servers (or computers with some kind of remote desktop application you can access from your browser) are up to date, to give the best and fastest experience to their costumers.

Too for companies it would be a great way to work since they will only have to do a quick browser update and change the servers (from a central place) to have their system running the latest new stuff.

I must admit though that I&#039;ll probably take some time to get people used to this kind of doing work and even longer to make people begin using the new system since most will want to have their own files on a physical media and not on a server somewhere in &#039;inter-space&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rob McDougall</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s only a matter of time. As with the idea behind this OS everything can be moved on the web which would make it smarter for the user since they then can have access to their stuff no matter where they are. At some point I&#8217;m sure Photoshop, After Effects, Final Cut etc. will be moved onto servers where your then pay for having access an amount of time. When you&#8217;ve payed you get directed to some sort of online remote desktop from where you can use the application online. When you&#8217;re done with your job you can send you files to your online storage device. It&#8217;s all be flowing and you won&#8217;t have the need to buy a new superduper computer with the latest graphics and processor power every third year since the company will be doing that making sure their servers (or computers with some kind of remote desktop application you can access from your browser) are up to date, to give the best and fastest experience to their costumers.</p>
<p>Too for companies it would be a great way to work since they will only have to do a quick browser update and change the servers (from a central place) to have their system running the latest new stuff.</p>
<p>I must admit though that I&#8217;ll probably take some time to get people used to this kind of doing work and even longer to make people begin using the new system since most will want to have their own files on a physical media and not on a server somewhere in &#8216;inter-space&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJ Fox</title>
		<link>http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-52559</link>
		<dc:creator>EJ Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kitsunenoir.com/blog/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/#comment-52559</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait to have this running on a computer in my house, I&#039;d love to have it running on a computer like the Litl ( http://litl.com/easy-to-use/intuitive-interface.htm ) which seems like an alternative take on the same idea.

Here&#039;s a piece I recently made for Mozy about the history of cloud computing: http://mozy.com/blog/misc/life-in-the-cloud/ -- I&#039;ve been waiting for chrome OS for a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to have this running on a computer in my house, I&#8217;d love to have it running on a computer like the Litl ( <a href="http://litl.com/easy-to-use/intuitive-interface.htm" rel="nofollow">http://litl.com/easy-to-use/intuitive-interface.htm</a> ) which seems like an alternative take on the same idea.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a piece I recently made for Mozy about the history of cloud computing: <a href="http://mozy.com/blog/misc/life-in-the-cloud/" rel="nofollow">http://mozy.com/blog/misc/life-in-the-cloud/</a> &#8212; I&#8217;ve been waiting for chrome OS for a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrome OS &#171; A dice&#38;dice blog by mikey</title>
		<link>http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-52557</link>
		<dc:creator>chrome OS &#171; A dice&#38;dice blog by mikey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kitsunenoir.com/blog/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/#comment-52557</guid>
		<description>[...] via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shady Tyrant</title>
		<link>http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-52544</link>
		<dc:creator>Shady Tyrant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kitsunenoir.com/blog/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/#comment-52544</guid>
		<description>I think chromeOS is a fantastic idea. A great new way of thinking about computers all together. This could take cloud based computing to a whole new level. However like others have mentioned I don&#039;t see support for any performance intensive programs coming anytime soon, if at all (FLstudios, Flash, IDEs, etc). Though for the majority of end users this could be the future of every day tasks (Email, IM, spreadsheets, word docs, shopping, social networking, etc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think chromeOS is a fantastic idea. A great new way of thinking about computers all together. This could take cloud based computing to a whole new level. However like others have mentioned I don&#8217;t see support for any performance intensive programs coming anytime soon, if at all (FLstudios, Flash, IDEs, etc). Though for the majority of end users this could be the future of every day tasks (Email, IM, spreadsheets, word docs, shopping, social networking, etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ikea</title>
		<link>http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-52535</link>
		<dc:creator>ikea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kitsunenoir.com/blog/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/#comment-52535</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not sure about this. after using blogger for a little while, i&#039;ve found the whole google network of sites to be bloated. settings are all over the place, two things that seem the same are different... i don&#039;t see having everything on the web and having it work smoothly at the same time working very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not sure about this. after using blogger for a little while, i&#8217;ve found the whole google network of sites to be bloated. settings are all over the place, two things that seem the same are different&#8230; i don&#8217;t see having everything on the web and having it work smoothly at the same time working very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob McDougall</title>
		<link>http://kitsunenoir.com/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/comment-page-1/#comment-52532</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob McDougall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kitsunenoir.com/blog/2009/11/19/google-chrome-operating-system/#comment-52532</guid>
		<description>Holy moly...

I already do a lot of that with Fluid - as in having seperate icons in my Dock for Gmail, Google Docs etc... But Chrome looks like it would handle this much better.

Unfortunately though, I doubt it would ever support Final Cut, After Effects, Ableton Live etc. etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Holy moly&#8230;</p>
<p>I already do a lot of that with Fluid &#8211; as in having seperate icons in my Dock for Gmail, Google Docs etc&#8230; But Chrome looks like it would handle this much better.</p>
<p>Unfortunately though, I doubt it would ever support Final Cut, After Effects, Ableton Live etc. etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
